|
|||
Wartime: 1942-1945In Mrs. Lilienthal's letters to me at college during 1943-45, we discuss war-related concerns that range from my summer work at a munitions factory to Mr. Lilienthal's various postings, and her own volunteer work in hospitals and on a farm. Our earliest correspondence debates my plan to spend the summer of 1943 working at a plant that made equipment for guns. Subsequently she alludes to the impact of wartime restrictions at Hunter, and to her husband's service both in the USA and in England. When I wrote her about what I saw as my options for ways to spend my summer vacation in 1943, she sends detailed advice.
Unwise perhaps, but I opted for the factory. That choice also meant that I could return to New York City for three months. After turning 18 in May 1943, I was eligible for a real job with paychecks, deductions for Social Security and a time-clock to record my arrivals and departures. My mother found a place for me where she worked, and rushed me through the application process. Ford Instrument Company, Long Island City, N.Y., made fire control equipment, meaning devices and parts to insure accurate aim when shooting. The guns involved, of many kinds and sizes, would then be mounted on ships and planes going into battle. Those three months at Ford Instrument stand as my only meaningful contribution to the war effort, unless it counts to endure restricted access to silk stockings, sugar, and gas, and to go to USO dances with men in uniform. Did defense work develop my empathy for the “physiological and psychological problems” of workers as Mrs. Lilienthal hoped? Hardly! At Ford Instrument I never met the kind of workers that my mentor envisioned. Highly skilled operators ran massive machines as well as intricate ones that could trim and sand metal pieces to nearly microscopic specifications. These were workers I found impressive, not oppressed. My summer job sent me running errands in the machine shops as well as doing desk work and filing. It was fun, profitable, and temporary. In contrast, Mrs. Lilienthal’s wartime efforts included volunteer hours and weeks as a nurse and a farm worker, jobs that were unpaid, and done in otherwise free time. Her activities were stressful, sometimes exhausting, and lasted for the duration. Also she spent most of the war as a wife-in-waiting for her soldier-husband. Meeting him in faraway places did include some holiday outings--still, her travel arrangements were difficult and expensive and the cities where they met were not always pleasant. She begins to write to me about such matters during August 1942:
She signs off with an emphatic wish: “Yours for a second front but NOW, RSL” (8/21/42) A month later she breathlessly describes trying to combine nursing classes with her regular duties at HCHS.
From October 1943 and until after the end of the war in Europe (May, 1945), Mrs. Lilienthal’s letters often tell of her husband’s training and service in the military. Also she mentions fulfilling her pledge to devote hours to nursing: I have just returned from giving service in the hospital and weary I am of spirit and appendages. (6/11/44) For three pages in this letter she focuses on a paper I wrote at the University of Alabama; she argues at length that I need a better grasp of themes in two novels I compared. Both implicitly raise issues of social justice; she concludes by suggesting a book that will clarify these issues: for a level-headed balance between the two [approaches] we have to read no novel: Henry Wallace’s Democracy Reborn. That book was indeed "no novel"; it was a newly published collection of Wallace's essays and speeches on politics, economics, and foreign relations. At the end of this letter, after deploring my less than perfect grade in Psychology, she adds an instruction to look up a book that explores wartime topics: Read Margaret Mead’s And Keep Your Powder Dry. Then she signs off, “Yours, and Fondly, RSL,” adding a word of warmth to counterbalance her pages of sharp critical comments. (6/11/44) Other anecdotes about Mrs. Lilienthal at HCHS during WWII have appeared in Part 1: students recall such matters as the strains of starting the school day an hour earlier and RSL's reaction to a news broadcast that interrupted her class. In many letters she speaks of Mr. Lilienthal’s service. At midsummer 1943, she writes of the season, Half all gone! Horrors, and then describes her holidays.
At least her soldier in training is near and has weekend leaves to join her in Brooklyn. During that fall, she looks forward to getting together with her husband for far more than just a weekend.
In November, she includes two vignettes, one about Mr. Lilienthal’s next posting, the other describing and an evening she spent on Broadway.
As she tells the other little wartime story, she quotes what I take to be a Brooklyn accent.
A month later, the soldier’s wife goes to Atlanta for Christmas only to discover that winter can be dismal even in the deep south: Shivering greetings from an icy cold and drowning wet town. I haven't seen a peach or green leaf. New York is not worse and much better. (postcard 12/26/43) Early in 1944 comes good news about her husband’s chance to get away from Georgia, if only temporarily.
Near the end of the letter, among other bits of advice, Mrs. Lilienthal asks me Have you read Archbishop of Canterbury’s Soviet Power? Mrs. Lilienthal joined her husband in Georgia during Hunter’s Spring Break in 1944. Her descriptions of their good times in Atlanta alternate with wry observations about the South.
They greatly enjoyed the musical evening and Levant’s wry comments. She tells about it for a full page. Then she adds a sociological analysis of the city.
Her closing words are: Yours for F.D.R, After the final rush of Hunter’s spring 1944 semester, she describes another whirling occasion when her soldier comes home between his assignments.
In midsummer 1944, RSL sends me a postcard from Oneonta, N, Y. about her not-quite-holiday as a volunteer harvester for the war effort.
Evidently I wrote back to her sounding dubious about her working holiday, because her next letter jokingly questions my commitment to war efforts like hers.
Then with wry wit she sums up her mixed feelings--pride in her success as a farm volunteer, yet relief that the two weeks of stoop labor are finished.
Her husband’s overseas posting turns out to be in Britain. In an April letter RSL mentions his holiday trip: Mr. Lilienthal has been visiting Scotland, and has praised it warmly. He even stood on a bus queue for 2 ½ hrs. to see Loch Lomond! (4/2/45) A few weeks later she mentions how much she misses him:
Although the battles in Europe had ended, no one then knew when the troops would be released to come home. RSL Speaking of HunterIn her letters to me at college Mrs. Lilienthal occasionally mentions the stress of her work at Hunter, and comments on girls I knew there. She may be irritated by academic demands, but always speaks warmly of students. In September 1942, she writes about both grappling with a cold and juggling many responsibilities: Programs, classes, irregular student assignments, committee meetings of the G.O. [General Organization] and assemblies, as well as frequent noontime meetings and the classes she attends after school to qualify as a Nurse’s Aid, a role she took on as a wartime volunteer. During the spring semester of 1943, she refers to the changed scheduling that resulted from wartime regulations. In February she writes:
And the letter ends: Three different preparations for tomorrow bid me say . . . G’Bye for now, R.S.L. In April she comments again on her distress about the wartime scheduling:
My friend Jolie Douglass, who also wrote to me at Montevallo, admires RSL's manner at the start of the day; Jolie poses as annoyed with our teacher's brisk composure:
Clearly, her students never suspected that Mrs. Lilienthal dreaded those early hours of double daylight savings time. Rita Wexler, who was graduated in 1945, praises RSL's positive attitude during those dark days of war and the inspiring way she would cheer up her students when they arrived in the dark. On a lighter note, Mrs. Lilienthal tells me about mixing end-of-semester school duties with festive gadding about while her husband returns home in June, 1944.
During our later years of correspondence, Ruth’s discussions of trends at Hunter reveal some tenets of her educational philosophy. In the Fall semester of 1949, she finds her work load too burdensome, too discouraging, while also bemoaning the sickening hiatus between theory and practice. She adds that she finds surcease through her own studies of voice production and three different points of view regarding correct body control (12/18/49). Critiques of Hunter predominate in a letter at the end of the spring semester in 1952. We have a male principal. Yes a male [a male symbol]. To this startling news, she adds unhappy prophecies: God wot what will happen in the next few years. Maybe even the core curriculum, maybe even coeducation (6/7/52). For comic relief, she quotes a list of bloopers saved by her friends in the English department from the essays written for Hunter's entrance examinations:
In December 1955, Ruth looks back over the Fall semester and finds it troubling that a new national policy has called for the pledge of allegiance to include a religious theme.
Also, she deplores the speed-up system for drilling some seniors, finding it a mistaken policy for students as well as an added strain on the faculty.
Recognizing that those who lead the "vanguard of panaceas" for education always insist that enrichment and advancement of this kind can occur together, she sighs "what self deception." Parenthetically she asks whether I heard Robert Frost’s interview “in which he said that the greatest conflicts have been between GOOD and GOOD?” (12/28/55). During the summer of 1962 Ruth writes at length, responding to what I have written to her about my children and my teaching, discussing JD Salinger's writings, and telling me how much she enjoys the season:
Even though she is relieved that school is out, she thinks back over the Spring semester at Hunter with satisfaction:.
She beams as always when students succeed, delighting in their talent and promise. In the final section of Classes and Beyond I included Mrs. Lilienthal's 1990 exchange of letters with Ruth Misheloff, a student who remembered her warmly. With equal warmth, Mrs. Lilienthal thanks Ms. Misheloff for her beautiful letter and speaks of the students at HCHS as precious individuals. RSL's pleasure in recalling "Hunter Girls" has not lessened across her lifetime. Seasons and SkiesScenes from nature and notes on the weather occur over and over again in RSL's letters. As she dates a letter she often adds a phrase that invites her reader to share the setting, like I’m sitting on the roof of my apartment, in the Blessed Sunshine. (6/8/42) Warmth is always welcome. In the next month of summer in l942, mid July, she comments below the opening date of her letter Temperature is what it should be, and I love it. Then she expands on her bent for sweltering. We have returned from the cool trees and quiet lakes to the heat-muffled building and steaming people---all but me. I am more alive than dead. (7/19/42) And if the weather falters, she complains: August 28, 1942, and disgracefully cool it is. When winter comes, she says Plague take the Thermometer. (2/2/43) Just as weather is never too hot for her, spring never comes too soon. She waits eagerly for the warmth she expects in April. Spring in fact, But not in deed (4/3/43). At the end of the month she finds the season both beautiful and healthful:
Along with the date of her letter on November 21, 1943, she welcomes a bit of Indian Summer.
The weather must, of course, return to normal: Sky cloudy, mercury low. (1/23/44) From 1942 to mid-1945, Mrs. Lilienthal is writing to me in Alabama as I go through college. The seasons she loves come sooner in the South.
Sometimes she mentions fog: Foggy as London, (9/19/42) In London Fog in Brooklyn (7/11/46), or blustery weather: How the winds are rude! (6/11/44) Rain is rarely noticed, but she does tell how it interfered with one memorable holiday.
More typically, her letters about holidays feature enjoying nature. Her postcard from a summer stay in Jeffersonville, N.Y., begins We’re loving the air with the trees and chickens. (7/7/42) Visiting the South for the first time in April 1944, Mrs. Lilienthal admires the lovely spring flowers that line many prosperous streets with their pink and white dogwoods and magnolias and spirea, making Atlanta look like a beautiful dream. But then she comments pointedly on the grim contrast she sees in the dusty streets of the poor. Returning from Atlanta, Mrs. Lilienthal delights to welcome the season back in Brooklyn.
Distant LandsAnother topic that Ruth writes joyously about is travel, especially going abroad. Her most lengthy description of an international trip is also the earliest one. She and Charles went by freighter to South America in 1949, traveling with a few other passengers, a Columbian crew, Scandinavian officers and a much-admired Greek captain. She includes lively characterizations of other travelers, and of shipboard conditions, especially the food. She is awed by their passage through the Panama Canal: which impressed me mightily and washed away my puny anticipatory urges. From the Pacific Coast the Lilienthals take a train inland for six hours from coastal humidity thru jungle thru plateau thru the Cordillera, a mountain range, to Cali! There she says she would like to live some years.
During the 1960’s both my life and Ruth’s change dramatically. She retires in 1962 and I complete my Ph.D. in American Literature in 1965. She still teaches yoga, while also studying Zen Buddhism intensely. In the 1970’s she will teach that discipline and its philosophy at the New School for Social Research. With my new degree, I move to Virginia to become an assistant professor of English at Old Dominion University in Norfolk. The next summer, 1966, the Lilienthals plan to visit me. I’m so pleased that I perhaps overdo my recommendations. Reviewing my long list of suggestions, Ruth replies it’s great copy you write for the Chamber of Commerce [of Norfolk], and seems quite amused that I praised the Dismal Swamp Canal Road! (6/10/66) among favorite waterways and attractions near the Atlantic Ocean. In her next letter she confirms their plans for an August visit, names the plays they want to see in our theaters, and says she’d love a whole morning or afternoon in your Municipal Gardens. But she does not want to see Norfolk’s military landmarks: I detest War Memorials (7/20/66). During their years in retirement, Ruth and Charles continue to delight in traveling. For some of their trips, however, Ruth describes their favorite places on tightly written postcards--some of them have been lost. In 1968, they went to Norway, Sweden, Finland, Denmark, and Russia. After getting back to Brooklyn, she writes mainly to answer my letters about events in my career, and to plan our summer get-together in New York. She merely lists the five countries visited and a dozen cities within them, adding no details on either scenic landscapes or fabled monuments. Her summation just says excitement, elation, exhaustion (7/27/68). But she recalls those 1968 travels happily; much later, in 1983, she writes about them again when Ernest and I tour the Scandinavian countries. She recaptures three vivid spots in memory:
Firsts may be the most, but Ruth also finds great joy in repeating the shipboard experience of cruising. The destinations, of course, are firsts in 1970: Aruba, Curacao, Caracas, Trinidad. On a postcard from Aruba she sends a joyous quatrain (4/21/70).
In 1974 when touring Portugal and Spain, Ruth names such cities as Lisbon, Seville, Granada, Madrid, and Salamanca. Then she ends her travelog by giving her highest praise to scenes in the countrysides:
Her students would be more pleased than surprised to hear their teacher speaking well of trees. Many recall walks on Park Avenue and in Central Park, and remember how Mrs. Lilienthal taught them the names of such species as ginkgo, sycamore, horse chestnut, and ailanthus, and asked them to make careful drawings of the leaves. When my husband and I flew to Greece in l978, Ruth wrote to us in Athens playfully evoking both her balmy day in Brooklyn and her memories of sailing in the Mediterranean.
She then recalls some of her favorites among the Greek Islands with exclamation points, perhaps to suggest increasing delight: Delos! Mykonos!! Santorini!!! Back to NatureAcross later years, Ruth’s characteristic ways of savoring the natural world still include both some lengthy scenic descriptions and more frequent small sensory glimpses. In December 1964, her note begins NO SNOW YET. And in 1967, as always, she finds cheer in the coming of Spring. Even here---at last! --- The snow has vanished. The crocuses have emerged, and the green buds are busting from the bushes. Even I feel a fine heave-ho. (4/21/67) Perhaps Ruth's most lyrical evocation of cosmic beauty appears in her foreword to Namu Dai Bosa (1976). Describing the skies and the turning seasons at the Dai Bosatsu monastery, she glories in the scenic loveliness while suggesting transcendent power: a natural setting where students are surrounded by the irresistible teachings of dawn, twilight, sun, moon, stars, morning mists, raindrops, snowflakes, ice forming, ice melting . . . . During the1980's, the last decade of our correspondence, Ruth continues to remark on the skies and the weather. Her July 1983 letter begins:
Her letter to China postmarked 7/8/87 begins with this earlier dateline: It’s a bleak day in June 1987. Then in April, 1988, Ruth again chooses trees for an image to welcome the season soon to come.
Editor's Note: In 2004 when I first re-read Mrs. Lilienthal's correspondence in sequence, I noticed how many topics came up repeatedly. Here I have selected just three to trace; the first two partly interweave with her Hunter years and the third, Travel, inspired her to create full, fervent and happy descriptions. Other subjects were vital to her, as well. Books absorbed her always, more steadily than seeing the world. For most of her life (as she told me about it) the theater and movies and music interested her a great deal. Her husband and family, her political concerns, and little vignettes from daily life enliven many a passage. The only other subject I review separately is her devotion to Zen Buddhism; for that chapter I depend on documents and interviews much more than her personal letters to me. See Zen: Ruth Becomes Chigetsu. Index -- Next: About Hunter College High School |
|||